<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WTF &#8211; Google must be mad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://myradicalblogs.com/index.php/2008/01/12/wtf-google-must-be-mad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://myradicalblogs.com/index.php/2008/01/12/wtf-google-must-be-mad/</link>
	<description>If I offend anyone - tough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:31:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Cozykittens</title>
		<link>http://myradicalblogs.com/index.php/2008/01/12/wtf-google-must-be-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3504</link>
		<dc:creator>Cozykittens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myradicalblogs.com/index.php/2008/01/12/wtf-google-must-be-mad/#comment-3504</guid>
		<description>It is possible your URL was owned by a more established site previously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible your URL was owned by a more established site previously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Campbell</title>
		<link>http://myradicalblogs.com/index.php/2008/01/12/wtf-google-must-be-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myradicalblogs.com/index.php/2008/01/12/wtf-google-must-be-mad/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>It is all very odd and mildly amusing that people get so obsessed about PR. It is only really important for monetised blogs. 

That said, it must be frustrating when circumstances like this come up, which seems to happen regularly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is all very odd and mildly amusing that people get so obsessed about PR. It is only really important for monetised blogs. </p>
<p>That said, it must be frustrating when circumstances like this come up, which seems to happen regularly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DazzlinDonna</title>
		<link>http://myradicalblogs.com/index.php/2008/01/12/wtf-google-must-be-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>DazzlinDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myradicalblogs.com/index.php/2008/01/12/wtf-google-must-be-mad/#comment-717</guid>
		<description>First of all, get all that other stuff like how good a site is, how many posts it has, what the Alexa rank is, etc. right out of your thinking when it comes to PageRank.  None of those things have anything at all to do with PR.  The ONLY thing that affects PR is the PR of links that point to the page.  That&#039;s it.  Nothing more (well, unless Google is playing one of its penalty games and fakes the PR to prove a point, but that&#039;s a whole different kettle of fish).  If you have a site that is PR0, and the links to it suggest it should be higher, then you may have a penalty, or it may just not have been updated to anything higher yet, but will eventually.  All it takes is just one link to affect your PR.  A page with just one link to it could be a PR6 (as an example), simply because the page that is linking to it has a very high PR and doesn&#039;t link to many other pages.  (The more pages it links to, the less PR it spreads to each).  Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, get all that other stuff like how good a site is, how many posts it has, what the Alexa rank is, etc. right out of your thinking when it comes to PageRank.  None of those things have anything at all to do with PR.  The ONLY thing that affects PR is the PR of links that point to the page.  That&#8217;s it.  Nothing more (well, unless Google is playing one of its penalty games and fakes the PR to prove a point, but that&#8217;s a whole different kettle of fish).  If you have a site that is PR0, and the links to it suggest it should be higher, then you may have a penalty, or it may just not have been updated to anything higher yet, but will eventually.  All it takes is just one link to affect your PR.  A page with just one link to it could be a PR6 (as an example), simply because the page that is linking to it has a very high PR and doesn&#8217;t link to many other pages.  (The more pages it links to, the less PR it spreads to each).  Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CFOtoGo</title>
		<link>http://myradicalblogs.com/index.php/2008/01/12/wtf-google-must-be-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>CFOtoGo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myradicalblogs.com/index.php/2008/01/12/wtf-google-must-be-mad/#comment-648</guid>
		<description>I have had the exact same experience. I have a site that I do nothing with and it gets no traffic and it got a 3, while my main site stays a 1. Who knows?  I am going to worry less about pagerank and more about quality content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had the exact same experience. I have a site that I do nothing with and it gets no traffic and it got a 3, while my main site stays a 1. Who knows?  I am going to worry less about pagerank and more about quality content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

