Flood Levy – Good Idea – Bad Implementation
I am going to declare my hand before proceeding – I am a labor supporter, always have been. When it comes to Julia Gillard, I am sitting on the fence at present. She has some very good attributes, but one very bad attribute – but then, she is a politician first. The one thing she wont do is listen to what others have to say, then make changes if their thoughts are logical.
The flood levy is one very good example. The levy in principle is, in my opinion, a good idea. The implementation is not what we need however. Why I disagree with Tony Abbott and co is very simple – he want to cut extra from the budget rather than implement a levy. I don’t know if he is really being sincere in this respect – Howard introduced a levy of 0.2% to help pay for the gun buy back scheme – I think this flood levy is on a par with that.
Back to my original point about cutting into the budget further, the problem I have with this is that, being Australia, final costs are always a lot more than originally estimated. What is now $5.6 billion in costs will most likely be $8 billion or more come the final reckoning. If those figures do blow out, that is when we will need to trim more from the budget. Trim it all now, and there is no room to move when we need to.
I said the flood levy was a good idea, and in principle it is. However, It is probably a little too much, but more importantly, being done for the wrong reason. Australia is a land of drama – we have floods, tropical cyclones, wild bushfires and even the odd earthquake. We need a permanent national disaster fund and this should be funded across a number of levels. First, a permanent levy at around 0.2% or even 0.25%. I agree with the targeting of higher paying incomes although $50k seems a little low. I would suggest starting at around $75k-$80k with the second tier cutting in at $150k with that levy at 0.5%. businesses should not be exempt, however I think this is where highly profitable companies can afford to pay – perhaps a 2.5% levy on all businesses that record $100 million plus per year profits.
Funds in this national disaster fund would accumulate until needed and would only be used to pay for infrastructure rebuilding and repair. It could be managed by an independent board, funding infrastructure on 1:1:1 basis – $1 for every $1 spent by both the Federal Government and the State Governments.
This levy is, as I suggested, a good idea. However, it is flawed in its rationale and in its life span. Of course, I am not an economist or politician so I just think logically.




